DEFENDANT`S MOTION FOR A SPEEDY TRIAL
<
TO THE HONORABLE IUDGE OF SAID COURT: 4 COMES NOW, (-;‘€AQV\/‘CK< CA/LAA/\\O L\-L ,\ , Defendant-in the above entitled and numbered cause,
and would show unto the Court as follows:
The indictment voted against the Defendant in the above entitled and numbered cause was returned on l`\i@\f` L€ , 20 \"L In the indictment the Defendant is charged with having committed
. th __/ ’ §@qz f€mb er Q\Q>
offense of ‘:Jl¢~w\ \Ocs§‘§: 0 l PVCQWV\, on or about `QJ°,%<_B\ , 20 )(o
II.
The Defendant was arrested on OC~XV L`i , 20 dl/¢@~ and On said date .was committed to the
Harris County ]ail Houston, Texas, to await trial on said indictment III.
At all times since his arrest the Defendant has been so confined and during his period of confinement the Defendant has at all times been ready for trial The Defendant has heretofore requested that the above entitled matter be brought to trial. Defendant claims his right to a Speedy Trial under the United States Constitution, 6th
v Amendment and Art..l & 10 of the Texas Constitution. v 1. See, C.A. Ark. 1977,_5§4 F.2d 249, duty of State to make a diligent', good faith effort to bring accused to trial'upon his demand, is particularly strong when accused is incarcerated l 2. ]aramillo vs. District Court In and For Rio Grande County, 1971/404 P. 2d 1219, 174 Colo. 561. Right~ under this amendment to a speedy trial is not only for the benefit of the accused but also for the pro- tection of the public; it is essential that an early determination of'gu_ilt be made, so that the innocent
:'“'035 may be exonerated and the guilty punished
3. See: Courtney vs. State (Cr.'App. 1971) 472 S.W. ZD 151. Purposes of constitutional right of speedy trial are; to prevent undue and oppressive incarceration prior to trial, to minimize anxiety and concern accompanying public accusation, and to limit possibilities that long delay will impair ability of '
accused to defend himself. l v 4. McKinney vs. State (Cr. App. 1973) 491`S.W. 2d 404. Defendant's right to a speedy trial began upon
his arrest approximately three months prior to return of indictment
WHE_REFORE, premises considered, the Defendant prays that this Court grant this Motion` for Speedy Trial in all
things sought therein.
Respectfully Submitted,
few ‘
l "I, (INSERT NAME AND INMATE IDENTIFYING NUMBER FROM TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
OR COUNTY |AIL), being presently incarcerated in (INSERT TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS UNIT NAME OR COUNTY lAIL NAM_E) in / J/g County, Texas, declare under penalty
' d`
of perjury that the for going is true and correct.
EXECUTED ON (DATE) (SIGNATURE)
ORDER
On this the day of , 20 , came to be heard`by me, the Defendant's Motion for Speedy Trial, and it appears to this court that this motionlshould be n l ` n GRANTED; DENIED: ' - , and it is
so ordered
]U_DGE PRESIDING
Certified Document Number: 72041587 - Page l of l
/b()\ 01 9 THE sTATE 0F TExAs 01024878 lb D.A. Loc; NUMBER:2294281 vs. ' _ » cns TRAcKmG No.; szm:mct< J. cRuMBLEY sPN; Bv; LP DA No; 002311840 g 13455 wooDFoREs'r BL #131 DoB; BM 10/05/1971 AGENCY:HCSO § ___! § HousToN, Tx 77015 DATE PR£PARED; 9/26/2016 o/R No; Hc160153757 § .a ; 5 v _ Amu-:sT DATE; 'ro Bt~: §§ § § .. ,_, o Ncic coDE; 5203 03 _ RF.LATED cAsEs; ""q §§ § ° .: 1a * FF.LONY CHARGE¢ FELoN m Posst~:ssioN oF qu;ARM 'm' 05 CAUSE NO¢ BAlL: $No BoND 34 HARRls couNTY DisTRicT couRT No: 1525005 meR CAUSE_NO: a FiRsT sETriNG DATE; _339 § s
lN THE NAME ANlD BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
Before me. the undersigted Assistant Distn`ct Attomey of Harris County, Texas, this day appeared the undersigned aHiant. who under oath says that he has good renon to believe and does believe that in Han'is County, Texas, FREDERICK J. CRUMBLEY hereafter styled the Defendant, heretofore on or about FEBRUARY 25, 2016, did then and there unlawfully intentionally and knowingly possess a firearm after having been convicted ofthe felony offense of BURGLARY OF A BU!LDING, in the District Court for the l74TH Judicial Disu-ict, HARR]S County, Texas, in Cause Number 1001437 on JUNE 21, 2005, and said possession ofthe firearm occurred before the fifth anniversary ofthe Defendant's release from confinement resulting from said conviction on SEPTEMBER 21, 201'4.
Before the commission of the oH`ense alleged above, (hereatter styled the primary offense), on IANUARY 26, 1990, in Cause Number 055 l 492, in the l83RD DISTRICT COURT of HARR.IS County, Texas, the Defendant was convicted ofthe felony ofBURGLARY OF A MOTOR VEH lCLE. ‘
Before the commission ofthe primary oH`ense, and aher the conviction in Cause Number 055 1492 was final, the Defendant committed the felony
of BlJRGLARY OF HABlTATlON and was finally convicted ofthat offense on AUGUST l2, 1991, in Cause Number 0591079, inv the 230TH DlSTRlCT COURT of HARR!S County, Texas. 4
PROBABLE CAUSE:
AFFIA`NT, ERIC BASSE, lS A PEACE OFFlCER EM'PLOYE'D BY THE HARRIS COUNTY SHEPJFF`S OFFi(.-`E. AFFIANT HAS REASON TO BELlEVE AND DOES BEL!E"’E THAT FREDERICK CRUMBLEY CONIMI'I'I'ED THE OFFENE`)E OF FELON [N ?GSSESSlON OF A FIREARM ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 26, 20|6 IN HARR!S COUNTY, TEXAS. AFFIANT BASES HlS BELlEF ON THE FOLLOWING FACTS.
ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2016, AFF!ANT WAS DlSPATCHED TO A WEAPONS DlSTURBA`NCE AT PARK TOWN PLAZ_A APARTMENTS, LOCATE,D,AT 13455 WOODFOREST BLVD. l'N HARRIS COU'NTY, 'I`EXAS. AFFlANT N[ET WITH FELIX HALTER, A CREDlBLE AND RELlABL.E PERSON HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE COMPLAINANT. COM.PLAlNANT TOLD AFFIANT THAT HE lS A TOW TRUCK DRIVER AND WAS ON THE FROPER'IY TO TOW A VEHICLE THAT WAS lMPROPERLY PARKED. COMPLA|NANT STATED THAT AS HE WAS START]'NG THE TOW PROCESS, THE VEHICLE OWNER, HELEN HUBBARD APPEARED AND TOLD HlM SHE WAS JUST VlSlTl`NG AND ABOUT TO LEAVE'. THE CONIPLAI'NANT TOLD HER THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO PAY A FEE. COMPLAl`NANT STATED THAT HUBBARD WENT BACK INSIDE, THEN REAPPEARED WlTH HER GRANDMOTHER, HELEN CRUMBLEY, TO PAY. COMPLAINANT STATED THAT HE THEN R.ELEASED THE VEHlCLE. COMPLAINANT STATED THAT AS HE RELEASED THE VEHlCLE. A MAROON VAN AND WHlTE SUV DROVE UP AND BLOCKED HlS TOW TRUCK. THE DEFENDANT EX|TED AND POTNTED A SHOTGUN AT COMPLAINANT, SAY¥NG "WHO SLAPPED MY MOMMA?" COMPLAINANT STATED THAT THE DEFENDANT ENTERED THE GRANDMOTHER'S APARTMENT AND_ Wl-{EN HE RETURNED, COMPLAINANT WAS ON THE PHONE W`lTH POLICE DISPATCH. AFFIANT SPOKE TO HELEN
-CRUMBLEY, WHO TOLD AFFlANT THAT HER SON'S NAME lS FREDER.|CK CRUMBLEY. AFF|ANT RESEARCHED FREDERICH
CRUMBLEY THROUGH HlS POL|CE DATABASES AND LOCATED A PHOTOGRAPH OF FREDER_ICK CRUN[BLEY. AFFlANT SHOWED THE PHOTO TO COMPLAFNANT WHO POSlTlVELV lDENTlFlED FREDERICK CRUMBLEY AS THE PERSON WHO HAD POINTED THE SHOTGU`N AT HIM. ' , 5 '
/
»
AGAlNST THE PEACE AND DIGNITY OF THE STATE.
Swom to and subscribed before me on September 26, 2016
gaf ¢/_"' @M\/Wzé
Assls 1“'151 TRicT ATrORNEY BAR No. AFF]ANT - ' oF coUNTY, TExAs.
REC\’.n-\ur;n'o mcmulRAND\.|l§ COM|PLA|NT This instrument is of poor quality at the time ot imaging
Z§/u}»,%" d cAUsE No. Z 553 500 5
1NTf1E 33ng ll l
]UDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF
HQ mg coUNTY, TEXAS v
THE STATE OF TEXAS
VS"
_§]l\.g |¢
MOTION TO OUASH ENHANCEMENT~PARAGRAPH
><><><><><
TO THE HONORABLE ]UDGE OF SAID COURT: Comes Now, FY`€{`pp/\[`Ck 0 n/Vl/lif)/€,L`/ , ` DEFENDANT in.the above entitled and num- bered cause and moves this court to quash the paragraph used for enhancement in the indictment of the above
v ' cause. l 65@[6(?7
This enhancement paragraph is cause No. £@_ , and in the support of this motion theDefendant
Would show the court the following
I
Defendant is charged , by indictment , of the offense of § i § l\l\{ 9‘\§§6"5§1`/)!\[` OQ Ql/`CCU`W\ which occurred on §CP f€i`"/\|~)€/"o% 20 `IL'¥`/é . v ' n
II
W l111 paragra§h 059[0 15 of the indictment , the state a
_ ancement purposes that on _ Hi , Defendant Was convicted in cause number..:/ ' for the offense of _/QL£;]M owe R.f. QO<'>" ’ _ . 4 ' .. l 'YHM_
. ' t 0 . . n ' _-__,;¢:-_-::-.-.,~‘.~;7.§.'~;= l`g' ¢)Hl/`/§n thec&_ District Court of HZQ_[Z 7§ County, Texas`. -
111 _ t ` The'conviction referred to in the enhancement paragraph is invalid in that (List one or more of the follow-
ing reasons whv vour enhancement paragraphs is void.')
[1 ' The conviction that being used for enhancement is a misdemeanor and cannot
be used to enhance this present felony unless this Was the third misdemeanor [Chancey V State , S.W. 2d 446]
l [2] Defendant Was not afforded representation by counsel at his trial, and he Was
indigent at that time. Also, at no time did the defendant Waive his right to counsel [Burgett V State, 389 U.S. 109.] `
[3] The conviction that is being used for enhancement Was based on a fundamentally defective indictment in that QHl/XZ, IOC)Uerl mm it)I\LQ ,Qll. 1905 U)i,e/'C 60er
ogsz ' 1 ‘ ‘ '\ (. ' 0 . [ White V State, 587 S.W. 2d 114 ] ` Vch)c@(
[4] ._ The conviction Which is being used for the enhancement Was ased on a c_rin_u`n - statue t `at Was ater found to be void in that (’m/p“'{` wr’»\§' l\A/\° OOTl Q@/.¢})c)rlt£>[ , L"Mmc wise 9mm/m 973;,,1;¢. [ Lopez v state , 491 s.W. 2d 420,] -'
[5] The conviction that is being'used for enhancement did not become final before
the offense charged Was committed , 'or that an appeal is pending. [ Murchison, 560 ~ s.W. 2d 654 ] 4 ~
[6] That the`D_efendant did not execute a validlwaiver of his right to a jury trial befor- ethe plea that supports the prior conviction. [Boyd V State, 660 S. W. 2d 720]
[7] -That the Defendant did~not sign a stipulation of evidence, in open court in the prior ' conviction being used for enhancement - - `
IV
Therefore, the enhancement paragraph is void in that it refers to a conviction which is invalid and thus ,
Will not support an enhancement of punishment in this case
WHEREFORE, premises considered , this Defendant,prays that this court quash the enhancement para- . graph alleged by the state for the purposes of enhancing the present offense.
Respectfully Sub itted '
"I, ( INSERT NAME AND INMATE IDENTIFYING NUMBER FROM TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
CORR-ECTIONS OR COUNTY AIL ), being presently incarcerated in ( INSERT TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS UNIT NAME OR COUNTY lAIL NAME) in County , Texas, declare under penalty
.of Pe_l”]`ury‘that the for going is true and correct. . <'*_/M/ . ` EXECUTED oN (DATE) M/$’ve&t "l=QO/`T _(SGNATURE) l§ » . “/ZH/ - ' oRDER _ ' '
On this the __ day of , 20 ,came to be heard by me `, the Defendant's motion , d v f . l To Quash Enhancement Paragraph'from the indictment , and it appears to this court th this motion should be ` l GRANTED; / `
; ` . - gab/ma 0 `:3 0 / cAUsE Nofj l§a'l.§€’(’>>' l _
,¢
'OF
//-=._-. ' . '
. » ¢) ) . THE STATE OF TEXAS X IN THE ,FZCZ ‘{'M X VS X ]UDICIAL DISTRICT COURT’ X X _
ic,"j€;i_ 35 ,,'(,i< f §,¢/U/!,éj,¢,¢i -%FZV/ 19 coUNTY, TEXAS
MOTION TO 'SET ASIDE THE INDICTMENT
TO THE HONORABLE ]UDGE OF SAID COURT: '
- CC)MES NOW, FY`CCl/?J`fcfc alj/Nl)[~{,l,{ l ' |, defendant in the above entitled cause , and prior to his /- her announcement of ready moves that the criminal indictment filed against him / her`in the above entitled and numbered cause be dismissed by virtue of the authority of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the con-
stitution of the United States of America, and Articles 27.02, 27.03, 27.08, and 27.09 of the Texas Code of Criminal
g Procedure;.and Article 1, Section 10 of the constitution of the State of Texas, for the following reasons:
The indictment does not state sufficient facts to constitute an offense against the laws of the State of
Texas II
The indictment fails to allege all the essential acts or omissions by the Defendant necessary to constitute
the offense charged
lll
./"'
The indictment fails to set forth sufficient facts and / or allegations/thief would appraise the Defendant
or_put the Defendant on no/tice \of'eomr'riitting, which acts or facts or circumstances, if proved, would render
n ` Defendant guilty, in order that the Defendant's right not to be prejudiced as contemplated in Article 21.01, et seq,
C.C.P.
LI.»030
lndictrnent wholly fails to allege on it's face, facts necessary to enable the Defendant to plead to the indict- ment so that a judgement would become a bar to subsequent prosecution for the same contemplated in Article
21.04, C.`C.P.
The indictment does not state the indictment was presented in the District Court of the county where the
Grand ]ury was in session.
n WHEREFORE, Defendant prays that the Court will set aside the indictment herein, and dismiss the cause
from the docket of this Court and release and discharge the Defendant from prosecution.
taint w
Defendant \
”I, (INSERT NAME AND INMATE IDENTIFYING NUMBER FROM TEXAS' DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR COUNTY IAIL) , being presently incarcerated in (INSERT TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS UNIT NAME OR COUNTY lAIL NAME) in l`lfl°r{’/"lc< . County,/ Tex'as, declare
under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct /,
Execured en …Ml>\ bl QO_ll //&MW v
(DATE) ' (sIGNXrURE) `~
O_RDLK
On this the day of , 20 , came to be heard petitioner's motion, and it
appears to this court that it should be: GRANTED
DENIED . , and it is
so ordered.
/§5<5005 l 'l _£;1,,-1;5/1”'
_ 1 UM§,_€/\/@M _ 1111 511/fr 111/1113 ~ » - 111 1111/3111 1111 1111 v ` 1/5 l\_151 1311'1 5101311§1 W,Ei:£md€ 6111111111111 ` . ' 1+/111111 15 low/111 /1”1<11;
1111111151 11111111>1:1111 11111:1113'
lo 1111 11011/>121112»11 10051§ 131§1;111 1011/21
@13111£ /1/1111 grade/1114 @MM/ 11/ bap 11114:11\ 111 1441 14111¢1
~ 514/1011 111/11 1110de 111/111 1111 1151@.;144)//1/ /]/€11711/5 415 141/1214 1111/1111 KFZU& »QM]@/m[$ 1431/11101111/ 111011`0/\11511’ 141 &)01`1/s jo 1414 dnfj dc 111 1/11
54111); 1411 EQUH 141@11111)1113
g 1421\1d&1\1f 411/11 1011<1441@111 AW111111 140/'/1114;/ 41 443[111/`1{>£1 Dl/@f _”JDAM§ 1111 111 1141/5111<19 of 1324¢)1111/ !0/7 1101@1£1)1/111[[1/€€1 011/ W/@1
MUf/h/\l 10 §ee[aédé 5@1[ d§/'d£_, 1111 I/\/d/QfMIA/i[
NML@_ 1441 01 Qn1d1/11fc 1411[11’11/11/5 1444/4 14 101 41 111/j 114 1441 /1/1/14/11/1/11 446
4c4111lé<4
1111th 11111111@11 611111111191/ 1111 §111)§111111/r1`111§ 11111/ 1111 1111/1111 11111111€1/
71 § 1 _, 51111$1 0. 5 5 5 l /1/ /02 00
111 1111 111/111 1111 111 11111111111 11,11111,11111111 11
' D1.44_1\1/1111\14 11111111/ 711/15 511/1171 1 41fo 1111 /11114//11;;@11/111/ 144 5/11//'11,§11/1"14
v 1104111/1_ §11111.441114 51 1144/211 514/2461 1441 41114 IPMDX/ 141 /)@//1/1 1111/4 /,)11;<; 113/iva 1 fred 1114 §11111/1414 111 11111/11/’1[41/4 441 1344/1111;14111\1 111 9111151/11/11 14 1 41`11<111111.11111114¢ c 511@15111\1 1111 1 11411141111111/1; ‘ 1
14};44\.1411114 41/11; -4211)/\1 11,4'41_41`11/11_ 1111¢`4411 4411/15 §410111141/_41<11461\4 0 /1/11 _/)1/1///4 411/1111 11401111 ‘12111,, `011111141111 141/1141 1411/1114 111/1411 1111 1441 411 1144 1
111141§4111€1/4.'14410_ 1464 113/11\/1'1¢141'@/\/ 441111 1011@15’) 1111/1111 £/,211/151 11 4241/1114 1442/10 014 /3@134111/ 144 1491/1111 1‘111'14411 -D1c114/c4 §1)111~14 4r 1441 /7$/14111141112/ 1115’4//0§, 14/111%
§111/1114'1/14€1111 1144 1413 411/3 111/111 1'*1/\/1/1-'@141'@/1/ 114111/ 141 111/11111411/1/ 1411114 /‘.s /1@ - U§[/d 4r 311/4111111/)11,1/4 11/1<15 411)1014111 0 43114011/1£11141//~1 041/4111411€ 1‘/1/1//‘£411€/114
111 1111 1111 111 1111 71
f
@4011/¢1 444/20/7,§41>1@\1141/1/141’1/1/11/1_140 1144/114 411044 /?/6-1/11/ /44111[//1/1/£7/%/ -/4/11§£ 441/1111 1311 1411 '33‘1114 -\11041111/ 051/1111 §11~114 141514114. Qc4411141/114 b@f)“)>w 112 40 ‘%111_1111~ 1111141“111411»1111"11@1. 14 1`§ 111.11@114111/11 111114€14 411 17/14114 441 131 4411/1411 504§1[11111411/11414114§ 14©11/1`4112(1A1 1411/fre 1704 1`1/1€11/)1/./4@/ 011%51114/1@4 1041 1414/111 4116 4411/1011/11/1/141//1/ 141_@;41/1_ 11114}@41111/1/4 4
44111_44 1111 '741 41 411/1114 1/111/ 11441114 %/1` //411/111.141_41)1411144%//1
§4/111114 1441 §41,14111411114`1 1/1’111141`0/\1 £€:1;06§4 1@1/ /44114/40/1/»444@§4”4£ LJQ//(/ gaf
cnw /1/€>; /§M@§ ¥
_Zj Mer/Lz I/Ym/I//é¢/ 5//\/ A/bj‘)/S 73 Z)€/r)él W/Zfé/lf~//$/ //c/£A//cc/"MQZ// MD /v/m?/v% LUx/[Vj@/f i/m MM//S /’DUAN{L/ 72¢%)5 @/AL}M m uwd£f P@n/a /H ABFVEI*}UM H)M Hw 1€// %//)9 f§ 7[%0€ Lm/j /Ar/€c _
_ [:YELN£D L»M'.»/NAM 9.£0/7 , . ` jMM‘ _
g _ my . _
[)N >VZ/; +%2 j/MA/ ’ /2» /Lam/_ /n/;Am/Q/z>’m¢
»L?w_ I@Ej)@/\MM¢P mov[/M/Qr /P£mf vg/ %/a// M/ %D %é )WM/M/§ 0/1/% [ZUH@ d@z£@j /`5 ad L?//m/z ia W)/s M[//\! M))
_ @m/A/fL/>: