Crumbaker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crumbaker v. State

807 S.W.2d 138, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 377, 1991 WL 35238

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 19, 1991

DocketNo. 58865

StatusPublished

This text of 807 S.W.2d 138 (Crumbaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crumbaker v. State, 807 S.W.2d 138, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 377, 1991 WL 35238 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief with[139]*139out an evidentiary hearing. Movant was found guilty by a jury on April 8, 1987 of the sale of cocaine and was sentenced to thirty-five years imprisonment on June 2, 1987. Movant’s conviction was affirmed on appeal by this court on May 24, 1988, 753 S.W.2d 76. Movant did not file a Rule 27.26 motion and did not file a Rule 29.15 motion by June 30, 1988.

Since movant was sentenced prior to January 1, 1988, he had until June 30, 1988, to file a Rule 29.15 motion. Rule 29.15(m). Movant’s failure to file a motion on or before June 30, 1988, constitutes a complete waiver of his right to proceed under Rule 29.15. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, sub. nom. Walker v. Missouri, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI