Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Crum v. Sanders

Crum v. Sanders

909 So. 2d 394, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12226, 2005 WL 1844514
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 5, 2005
DocketNo. 1D05-2049
StatusPublished

This text of 909 So. 2d 394 (Crum v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crum v. Sanders, 909 So. 2d 394, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12226, 2005 WL 1844514 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Saba v. Bush, 883 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)(stating that a petition for writ of mandamus is not available if there exists an adequate remedy at law).

KAHN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saba v. Bush
883 So. 2d 858 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
909 So. 2d 394, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12226, 2005 WL 1844514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crum-v-sanders-fladistctapp-2005.