Crum v. Horowitz

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Crum v. Horowitz

796 A.2d 470, 2002 R.I. LEXIS 73, 2002 WL 973162

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedApril 19, 2002

DocketNo. 2001-10-Appeal

StatusPublished

This text of 796 A.2d 470 (Crum v. Horowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crum v. Horowitz, 796 A.2d 470, 2002 R.I. LEXIS 73, 2002 WL 973162 (R.I. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The plaintiff, Brian K. Crum, appeals from a Superior Court summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Ford Motor Credit Company.

This appeal came before a single justice of this Court, who ordered the parties to show cause why it should not be summarily decided. After hearing their arguments and considering their legal memoranda, we conclude that cause has not been shown, and we proceed to summarily decide the appeal.

In accordance with our consolidated opinion in Judith J. Oliveira v. Steven A Lombardi et al., C.A. No.2001-27-Appeal and Michael R. Ayers v. Joseph A. Tiberi et al., No.2000-273-Appeal, 794 A.2d 453, (R.I.2002) and the rationale set out therein, we sustain the plaintiffs appeal, vacate the motion justice’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, and remand this case to the Superior Court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion in those consolidated cases.

Chief Justice WILLIAMS did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI