Cruise (Robert) Vs. State

468 P.3d 377

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: August 7, 2020
• Docket: 81464
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERT CRUISE, No. 81464 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

FILED AUG 0 7 2020 EUTASETH A. !AMR CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By 'c •Vr DEPUTY%-aLIZIZt

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se notice of appeal from district court orders denying a presentence motion to dismiss counsel and appoint alternate counsel and denying a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. First, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a presentence motion to dismiss counsel and appoint alternate counsel. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Second, an order denying a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea is not a final appealable order; the decision may be challenged on appeal from the

o -‘91/(77 judgment of conviction. NRS 177.015(3); NRS 177.045; Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 686 P.2d 222 (1984). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1

Parraguirre

I , J. Hardesty Cadish

cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Robert Cruise Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'Given this order, no action will be taken on the pro se motion filed on July 22, 2020. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

ICI) 1947A 44011. 2