Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Cruikshank v. Sacks

Cruikshank v. Sacks

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 552
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 1, 1961·No. No. 36714·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by wav\ of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to re[553]*553view the alleged irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruikshank v. Sacks, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 552 (Ohio 1961).

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 552 (Cruikshank v. Sacks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.