Cruikshank v. Sacks
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 552
This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 552 (Cruikshank v. Sacks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cruikshank v. Sacks, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 552 (Ohio 1961).
Opinion
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by wav\ of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to re[553]*553view the alleged irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruikshank-v-sacks-ohio-1961.