Cruikshank v. Cruikshank
170 A. 659, 115 N.J. Eq. 322
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Matthews in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cruikshank v. Cruikshank, 170 A. 659, 115 N.J. Eq. 322 (N.J. 1934).
170 A. 659 (Cruikshank v. Cruikshank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.