Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Cruikshank v. Cruickshank

Cruikshank v. Cruickshank

170 A. 659, 115 N.J. Eq. 322, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 763
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 2, 1934·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Matthews in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruikshank v. Cruickshank, 170 A. 659, 115 N.J. Eq. 322, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 763 (N.J. 1934).

170 A. 659 (Cruikshank v. Cruickshank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.