Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. Egan
This text of Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. Egan (Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. Egan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
BONNIE CRUICKSHANK-WALLACE AND : No. 852 MAL 2017 WILLIAM WALLACE, : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND : CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY : AND COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY : AND JAMES S. TUPITZA, ESQUIRE AND : TUPITZA & ASSOCIATES, P.C., : : Respondents :
BONNIE CRUICKSHANK-WALLACE AND : No. 853 MAL 2017 WILLIAM WALLACE, : : Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : GERARD P. EGAN, ESQUIRE AND : EGAN YOUNG LAW FIRM AND NEIL E. : JOKELSON, ESQUIRE AND NEIL E. : JOKELSON & ASSOCIATES, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and
Application for Leave to Amend/Supplement PAA are DENIED. [852 MAL 2017 and 853 MAL 2017] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. Egan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruickshank-wallace-pets-v-egan-pa-2018.