Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. CNA
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
BONNIE CRUICKSHANK-WALLACE AND : No. 852 MAL 2017 WILLIAM WALLACE, :
:
Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :
v. :
: :
CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND : CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY : AND COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY : AND JAMES S. TUPITZA, ESQUIRE AND : TUPITZA & ASSOCIATES, P.C., :
:
Respondents :
BONNIE CRUICKSHANK-WALLACE AND : No. 853 MAL 2017 WILLIAM WALLACE, :
:
Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :
v. :
: :
GERARD P. EGAN, ESQUIRE AND : EGAN YOUNG LAW FIRM AND NEIL E. : JOKELSON, ESQUIRE AND NEIL E. : JOKELSON & ASSOCIATES, :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and
Application for Leave to Amend/Supplement PAA are DENIED.
[852 MAL 2017 and 853 MAL 2017] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. CNA (Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. CNA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.