Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. CNA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 19, 2018·No. 852 MAL 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

BONNIE CRUICKSHANK-WALLACE AND : No. 852 MAL 2017 WILLIAM WALLACE, :

:

Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :

v. :

: :

CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND : CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY : AND COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY : AND JAMES S. TUPITZA, ESQUIRE AND : TUPITZA & ASSOCIATES, P.C., :

:

Respondents :

BONNIE CRUICKSHANK-WALLACE AND : No. 853 MAL 2017 WILLIAM WALLACE, :

:

Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :

v. :

: :

GERARD P. EGAN, ESQUIRE AND : EGAN YOUNG LAW FIRM AND NEIL E. : JOKELSON, ESQUIRE AND NEIL E. : JOKELSON & ASSOCIATES, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and

Application for Leave to Amend/Supplement PAA are DENIED.

[852 MAL 2017 and 853 MAL 2017] - 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. CNA, (Pa. 2018).

Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. CNA (Cruickshank-Wallace, Pets. v. CNA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.