Cruickshank v. City of Pontiac
711 N.W.2d 43, 474 Mich. 1086, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 446
This text of 711 N.W.2d 43 (Cruickshank v. City of Pontiac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cruickshank v. City of Pontiac, 711 N.W.2d 43, 474 Mich. 1086, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 446 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Kevin CRUICKSHANK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF PONTIAC, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2005 *44 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal because she believes this case is moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. MEMMER
711 N.W.2d 43 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 43, 474 Mich. 1086, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruickshank-v-city-of-pontiac-mich-2006.