Cruickshank v. City of Pontiac
711 N.W.2d 43, 474 Mich. 1086, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 446
Opinion
Kevin CRUICKSHANK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF PONTIAC, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2005 *44 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal because she believes this case is moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cruickshank v. City of Pontiac, 711 N.W.2d 43, 474 Mich. 1086, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 446 (Mich. 2006).
711 N.W.2d 43 (Cruickshank v. City of Pontiac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. MEMMER
711 N.W.2d 43 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)