Cruickshank v. City of Chicago

54 N.E. 997, 181 Ill. 415
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 19, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 54 N.E. 997 (Cruickshank v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cruickshank v. City of Chicago, 54 N.E. 997, 181 Ill. 415 (Ill. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the county court of Cook county confirming a special assessment. The ordinance providing for the improvement fails to state the heig'ht of. the curb required to be constructed ou each side of the street, and on account of this 'defect it is claimed that the ordinance is invalid. The ordinance involved, so far as the height of the curb is concerned, is substantially like the ordinance which was held to be invalid in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263, and the ruling in that case must control here.

As to the property set out and described in thg assignment of errors in the record, the judgment of confirmation is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the county court.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holden v. City of Chicago
50 N.E. 181 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 N.E. 997, 181 Ill. 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruickshank-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1899.