Crugnale v. City of Niagara Falls
40 A.D.2d 626, 336 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3852
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 27, 1972
StatusPublished
This text of 40 A.D.2d 626 (Crugnale v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crugnale v. City of Niagara Falls, 40 A.D.2d 626, 336 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Matter of Murray [627]*627v. City of New York, 30 N Y 2d 113.) (Appeal from order of Niagara Special Term granting leave to file notice of claim.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Marsh, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.2d 626, 336 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crugnale-v-city-of-niagara-falls-nyappdiv-1972.