Cruger v. City of Miami

Supreme Court of Florida

Cruger v. City of Miami

152 So. 409, 113 Fla. 138, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1694

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cruger v. City of Miami. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 Fla. 795 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 5, 1933·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties', and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the s'aid judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford and Brown, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Ellis, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties', and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the s'aid judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford and Brown, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Ellis, J., dissent.

Cruger v. City of Miami, 152 So. 409, 113 Fla. 138, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1694 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

152 So. 409 (Cruger v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.