Crudup v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crudup v. State

490 S.W.3d 791, 2016 WL 3069027, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 542

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 31, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103106

StatusPublished

This text of 490 S.W.3d 791 (Crudup v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crudup v. State, 490 S.W.3d 791, 2016 WL 3069027, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 542 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Billy H. Crudup appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Billy H. Crudup appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 S.W.3d 791, 2016 WL 3069027, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crudup-v-state-moctapp-2016.