Cruden v. . Neale

2 N.C. 338
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 5, 1796
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 N.C. 338 (Cruden v. . Neale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cruden v. . Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).

Opinions

It is not stated in the plea, nor clearly admitted at the bar, whether the plaintiff was ever a citizen of this country, or only resided here, in the time of the formation of the new government. If he only resided here, and never became a citizen, he is to be considered as a British subject; and that perhaps may make his case very different from that of a citizen who attached himself to an enemy and took up arms against the country.

Counsel for the plaintiff: He never was a citizen; the counsel on the other side cannot say he was; the plea does not state him to have been a citizen at the time of his departure. *Page 265

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Com. v. Buterbaugh, J.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2025
McDade, David Kent
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.C. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruden-v-neale-ncsuperct-1796.