Cruden v. . Neale

2 N.C. 338
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided May 5, 1796·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

It is not stated in the plea, nor clearly admitted at the bar, whether the plaintiff was ever a citizen of this country, or only resided here, in the time of the formation of the new government. If he only resided here, and never became a citizen, he is to be considered as a British subject; and that perhaps may make his case very different from that of a citizen who attached himself to an enemy and took up arms against the country.

Counsel for the plaintiff: He never was a citizen; the counsel on the other side cannot say he was; the plea does not state him to have been a citizen at the time of his departure. *Page 265

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruden v. . Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).

2 N.C. 338 (Cruden v. . Neale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Buterbaugh, J.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2025
McDade, David Kent
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015