Crudele v. M & M Sand & Fill Co.

194 So. 2d 16
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 17, 1967
DocketNo. 66-352
StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 2d 16 (Crudele v. M & M Sand & Fill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crudele v. M & M Sand & Fill Co., 194 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant claimed a landlord’s lien for rent which the trial court denied in a final decree determining priority of liens. We affirm upon authority of Van Hoose v. Robbins, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 209, 212.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Hoose v. Robbins
165 So. 2d 209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 2d 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crudele-v-m-m-sand-fill-co-fladistctapp-1967.