Crozier v. State

149 S.W.2d 108, 141 Tex. Crim. 407, 1941 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 175
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 26, 1941·No. No. 21517.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property, the punishment assessed being fifteen days in jail.

The transcript shows, that there was a docket entry of the notice of appeal but nothing to indicate that it was ever carried into the court’s minutes. It has been held repeatedly and consistently that a docket entry does not comply with the requirement of Art. 827, C. C. P. See authorities cited under said article in Vernon’s Ann. Texas C. C. P., Vol. 3; Branch’s Ann. Texas P. C., p. 302, sec. 588; 4 Tex. Jur., secs. 77 and 78.

In the face of consistent holdings that, in order to give this court jurisdiction, the notice of appeal must be entered in the minutes of the court, it is surprising how many cases still reach us in which the record either shows no notice of appeal at all or a docket entry only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crozier v. State, 149 S.W.2d 108, 141 Tex. Crim. 407, 1941 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 175 (Tex. 1941).

149 S.W.2d 108 (Crozier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stokes v. State
220 S.W.2d 152 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Clark v. State
218 S.W.2d 210 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Hughes v. State
218 S.W.2d 479 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)