Crozier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Crozier v. State

139 S.E. 131, 37 Ga. App. 160, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 546

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 26, 1927

Docket18269, 18270

StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 131 (Crozier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crozier v. State, 139 S.E. 131, 37 Ga. App. 160, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 546 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The defendant was convicted of carrying a pistol and of pointing a pistol at another. The two eases were tried together. The motion for a new trial in each case is based on the general grounds only. The evidence authorized the verdict, which was approved by [161]*161the trial judge, and the judgments overruling the motions for a new trial are Affirmed.

Decided July 26, 1927. B. A. Paterson, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellón), solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, E. C. Hill, contra. Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The defendant was convicted of carrying a pistol and of pointing a pistol at another. The two eases were tried together. The motion for a new trial in each case is based on the general grounds only. The evidence authorized the verdict, which was approved by [161]*161the trial judge, and the judgments overruling the motions for a new trial are Affirmed.

Decided July 26, 1927. B. A. Paterson, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellón), solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, E. C. Hill, contra. Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 S.E. 131, 37 Ga. App. 160, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crozier-v-state-gactapp-1927.