Crozier v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crozier v. Richardson

178 A.D. 927

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 A.D. 927 (Crozier v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crozier v. Richardson, 178 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to enforce restitution and recovery, at the suit of a taxpayer, for collusive audit or payment, collusion is the gravamen of the action. Collusion not being proved, it is unnecessary in this action to decide the legality of the claims. The judgment is affirmed, with costs, on authority of Daly v. Haight (170 App. Div. 469). Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to enforce restitution and recovery, at the suit of a taxpayer, for collusive audit or payment, collusion is the gravamen of the action. Collusion not being proved, it is unnecessary in this action to decide the legality of the claims. The judgment is affirmed, with costs, on authority of Daly v. Haight (170 App. Div. 469). Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 A.D. 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crozier-v-richardson-nyappdiv-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack