Crozier v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crozier v. Richardson

178 A.D. 927

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to enforce restitution and recovery, at the suit of a taxpayer, for collusive audit or payment, collusion is the gravamen of the action. Collusion not being proved, it is unnecessary in this action to decide the legality of the claims. The judgment is affirmed, with costs, on authority of Daly v. Haight (170 App. Div. 469). Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to enforce restitution and recovery, at the suit of a taxpayer, for collusive audit or payment, collusion is the gravamen of the action. Collusion not being proved, it is unnecessary in this action to decide the legality of the claims. The judgment is affirmed, with costs, on authority of Daly v. Haight (170 App. Div. 469). Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Crozier v. Richardson, 178 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

178 A.D. 927 (Crozier v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related