Crozier v. Osborn
95 S.E. 223, 147 Ga. 650, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 92
Opinion
Under the pleadings and the evidence in this case and the law applicable thereto, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in appointing a temporary receiver and granting an interlocutory injunction. The case differs upon its facts from Sumner v. Bell, 118 Ga. 240 (44 S. E. 973).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crozier v. Osborn, 95 S.E. 223, 147 Ga. 650, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 92 (Ga. 1918).
95 S.E. 223 (Crozier v. Osborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sumner v. Bell
44 S.E. 973 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)