CROXDALE v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
This text of 954 So. 2d 1255 (CROXDALE v. Florida Dept. of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John H. CROXDALE, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*1256 John H. Croxdale, pro se, Petitioner.
Kathleen Von Hoene, General Counsel, and Sean T. Garner, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. See Crockett v. Singletary, 723 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (alleged failure to properly award credit pursuant to Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), is properly remediable by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800).
WOLF, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
954 So. 2d 1255, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6279, 2007 WL 1213700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/croxdale-v-florida-dept-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2007.