Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/CROXDALE v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

CROXDALE v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

954 So. 2d 1255, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6279, 2007 WL 1213700
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 2007·No. 1D06-5384·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

954 So.2d 1255 (2007)

John H. CROXDALE, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D06-5384.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 26, 2007.

*1256 John H. Croxdale, pro se, Petitioner.

Kathleen Von Hoene, General Counsel, and Sean T. Garner, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. See Crockett v. Singletary, 723 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (alleged failure to properly award credit pursuant to Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), is properly remediable by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800).

WOLF, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CROXDALE v. Florida Dept. of Corrections, 954 So. 2d 1255, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6279, 2007 WL 1213700 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 1255 (CROXDALE v. Florida Dept. of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LB v. Department of Children and Families
954 So. 2d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)