Croxall v. Hutchings
12 N.J.L. 84
Opinion
The j udgment should be reversed for the insufficiency -of the affidavit. The direction of the attachment act has not been followed. Absence and non-residence are not convertible terms. The latter is required. This objection may be properly urged under the general reason.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Croxall v. Hutchings, 12 N.J.L. 84 (N.J. 1830).
12 N.J.L. 84 (Croxall v. Hutchings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.