Crowther v. Micucci
196 A. 676, 123 N.J. Eq. 164, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 637
Opinion
The proofs, carefully examined, abundantly support the findings of the learned vice-chancellor from whose decree the present appeal is taken, and we agree with his finding on the rule of law as to the burden of proof.
The decree will be affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crowther v. Micucci, 196 A. 676, 123 N.J. Eq. 164, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 637 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).
196 A. 676 (Crowther v. Micucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brettenheimer v. Brettenheimer
37 A.2d 43 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Hackensack Trust Co. v. Nowacki
3 A.2d 615 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)