Crowther v. Micucci

196 A. 676, 123 N.J. Eq. 164, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 637
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 26, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 196 A. 676 (Crowther v. Micucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crowther v. Micucci, 196 A. 676, 123 N.J. Eq. 164, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 637 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The proofs, carefully examined, abundantly support the findings of the learned vice-chancellor from whose decree the present appeal is taken, and we agree with his finding on the rule of law as to the burden of proof.

The decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brettenheimer v. Brettenheimer
37 A.2d 43 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Hackensack Trust Co. v. Nowacki
3 A.2d 615 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 A. 676, 123 N.J. Eq. 164, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowther-v-micucci-njsuperctappdiv-1938.