Crowther v. Crowther

55 Me. 358
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 55 Me. 358 (Crowther v. Crowther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crowther v. Crowther, 55 Me. 358 (Me. 1868).

Opinion

Appleton, C. J.

The case comes before us on an agreed statement of facts, and the question presented is whether a wife can maintain a suit against her husband on a note given her by him.

At common law such a suit could not be maintained. By R. S., 1857, c. 61, § 3, the wife is authorized to "prosecute and defend suits at law or in equity for the preservation and protection of her property, as if unmarried, or may do it jointly with her husband.” This, section manifestly refers to suits by the wife against third persons and empowers her to maintain an action in her own name or in the joint names of herself and husband, at her election. It does not contemplate a suit by the wife against the husband, nor that he should be arrested and imprisoned at her instance. Such has been the uniform construction of this and similar statutes in this State and in Massachusetts. Smith v. Gorman, 41 Maine, 408; Jackson v. Parks, 10 Cush., 550; Ingham y. White, 4 Allen, 412. If the present statutes do not adequately protect the rights of the wife, it is for the Legislature to make such further provision for their protection as it may deem expedient. Plaintiff nonsuit.

Kent, Walton, Dickerson, Daneorth and Tapley, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moulton v. Moulton
309 A.2d 224 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1973)
Courtney v. Courtney
1938 OK 538 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Peters v. Peters
103 P. 219 (California Supreme Court, 1909)
Roseberry v. Roseberry
27 W. Va. 759 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 Me. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowther-v-crowther-me-1868.