Crowson v. Cody
267 U.S. 579, 45 S. Ct. 351
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens’ Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450. (See 266 U. S. 590.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crowson v. Cody, 267 U.S. 579, 45 S. Ct. 351 (1925).
267 U.S. 579 (Crowson v. Cody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ireland v. Woods
246 U.S. 323 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Stadelman v. Miner
246 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Basham
249 U.S. 164 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. Opperman
249 U.S. 448 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)