Crowson v. Cody

Supreme Court

Crowson v. Cody

267 U.S. 579, 45 S. Ct. 351

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 2, 1925

DocketNo. 590

StatusPublished

This text of 267 U.S. 579 (Crowson v. Cody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crowson v. Cody, 267 U.S. 579, 45 S. Ct. 351 (1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens’ Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450. (See 266 U. S. 590.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens’ Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450. (See 266 U. S. 590.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 U.S. 579, 45 S. Ct. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowson-v-cody-scotus-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack