Crown Window Co. v. Piesco
633 So. 2d 490, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1980, 1994 WL 59433
Opinion
In this workers’ compensation case, the employer and servicing agent seek review of an order directing that they bear the expense of an additional medical evaluation and, if necessary, palliative treatment. Both of the medical doctors who testified at the hearing were of the opinion that claimant had reached maximum medical improvement nearly four years earlier, with no permanent impairment or restrictions. Because this case is indistinguishable from Amoco Container Co. v. Singh, 418 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), we reverse.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crown Window Co. v. Piesco, 633 So. 2d 490, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1980, 1994 WL 59433 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
633 So. 2d 490 (Crown Window Co. v. Piesco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Amoco Container Co. v. Singh
418 So. 2d 395 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)