Crown Kingdom Embassy v. United States

18 F. App'x 897, 51 Fed. Cl. 897
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 2001
DocketNo. 01-5110
StatusPublished

This text of 18 F. App'x 897 (Crown Kingdom Embassy v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crown Kingdom Embassy v. United States, 18 F. App'x 897, 51 Fed. Cl. 897 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

Opinion

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The United States moves to summarily affirm the Court of Federal Claims’ judgment dismissing the Crown Kingdom Embassy’s complaint. The Crown Kingdom Embassy has not responded.

A complaint was filed with the Court of Federal Claims seeking $32 trillion in damages and an order compelling the United States to sign a deed for San Clemente Island. The complaint was signed by “His Royal Majesty King Gordon I.” Based on documents attached to the plaintiffs brief, it appears that Gordon Price is the person behind the complaint. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, noting that the plaintiff had incorrectly asserted that jurisdiction need not exist and, in any event, holding that none of the allegations stated a claim within the court’s jurisdiction. In the informal brief, plaintiff raises arguments concerning the failure of the Department of Veterans Affairs to pay for medical treatment.

The United States argues that the Court of Federal Claims’ judgment should be summarily affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on Motion
17 F.3d 378 (Federal Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. App'x 897, 51 Fed. Cl. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crown-kingdom-embassy-v-united-states-cafc-2001.