Crowley v. Underleak
This text of 22 N.W. 443 (Crowley v. Underleak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The controversy is as to the true location, with reference to the United States survey, of the boundary line between certain subdivisions of a section of land. The determination depends upon the location of monuments established by the government survey in 1856. There is a substantial conflict in the evidence, and, after a careful consideration of it, we find no sufficient reason for setting aside the determination of the jury, sanctioned by the trial court.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 N.W. 443, 33 Minn. 197, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowley-v-underleak-minn-1885.