Crowley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Crowley v. State

122 S.E. 909, 32 Ga. App. 330, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 372

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 13, 1924

Docket15417

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E. 909 (Crowley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crowley v. State, 122 S.E. 909, 32 Ga. App. 330, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 372 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1- A conviction of larceny was authorized by the evidence.

2. The seven grounds of the motion for a new trial, as to the exclusion of evidence, the alleged insufficiency of evidence, and alleged error in excerpts from the charge of the court, are without substantial merit. The defendant has had a legal trial, and for no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affi/rmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur. II. B. Edwards, Hendricks & Hendricks, for plaintiff in error. ~ G. E. Hay, solicitor-general, Eva L. Hay, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1- A conviction of larceny was authorized by the evidence.

2. The seven grounds of the motion for a new trial, as to the exclusion of evidence, the alleged insufficiency of evidence, and alleged error in excerpts from the charge of the court, are without substantial merit. The defendant has had a legal trial, and for no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affi/rmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur. II. B. Edwards, Hendricks & Hendricks, for plaintiff in error. ~ G. E. Hay, solicitor-general, Eva L. Hay, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.E. 909, 32 Ga. App. 330, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowley-v-state-gactapp-1924.