Crowley v. Rabb

120 So. 546, 10 La. App. 62, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 453
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 25, 1929
DocketNo. 11,604
StatusPublished

This text of 120 So. 546 (Crowley v. Rabb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crowley v. Rabb, 120 So. 546, 10 La. App. 62, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 453 (La. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

WESTERFIIDLD, J.

This is a suit for damages growing out of a collision between automobiles at a street intersection. There was judgment below for plaintiff as prayed for, in the sum of $110.71. Defendant has appealed.

The accident occurred in the intersection of St. Ann and Dauphine Streets. Plaintiff’s car, which was proceeding up St. Ann Street, in the direction of Canal Street, admittedly had the right of way under the Traffic Ordinance. The defendant contends that his car had entered the intersection first and was, therefore, entitled to proceed, notwithstanding plaintiff’Si right of way.

The principle of law relied upon by defendant is well settled. Smyth vs. Hill Stores, 8 La. App. 246, and authorities there cited.

The question presented is one of fact, that is, which car first entered the intersection?

The trial court resolved this question in favor of plaintiff, and our examination of the record fails to disclose any manifest error in its conclusion.

The amount of damages does not appear to be in dispute. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smyth v. Hill Stores, Inc.
8 La. App. 246 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 So. 546, 10 La. App. 62, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowley-v-rabb-lactapp-1929.