Crowley v. McCracken

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Crowley v. McCracken

74 S.E. 701, 11 Ga. App. 69, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 260

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1912

Docket3865

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 701 (Crowley v. McCracken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crowley v. McCracken, 74 S.E. 701, 11 Ga. App. 69, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 260 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C, J.

1. A defendant can not complain because a verdict rendered against Mm was too small, under the evidence, and should have been for a larger amount. Jones & Phillips, Inc. v. Patrick, ante, 67; Pullman Co. v. Schaffner, 126 Ga. 609 (55 S. E. 933) ; Central Ry. Co. v. Trammell, 114 Ga. 315 (40 S. E. 259) ; Strickland v. Hutchinson, 123 Ga. 399 (51 S. E. 348); Roberts v. Rigden, 81 Ga. 440 (7 S. E. 742).

2. No specific error of law is complained of, and the verdict is supported by the evidence. The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages on the amount of the judgment recovered in the court below, for delay on account of suing out and prosecuting the writ of error.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C, J.

1. A defendant can not complain because a verdict rendered against Mm was too small, under the evidence, and should have been for a larger amount. Jones & Phillips, Inc. v. Patrick, ante, 67; Pullman Co. v. Schaffner, 126 Ga. 609 (55 S. E. 933) ; Central Ry. Co. v. Trammell, 114 Ga. 315 (40 S. E. 259) ; Strickland v. Hutchinson, 123 Ga. 399 (51 S. E. 348); Roberts v. Rigden, 81 Ga. 440 (7 S. E. 742).

2. No specific error of law is complained of, and the verdict is supported by the evidence. The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages on the amount of the judgment recovered in the court below, for delay on account of suing out and prosecuting the writ of error.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 S.E. 701, 11 Ga. App. 69, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowley-v-mccracken-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack