Crowley v. Hanf
226 N.E.2d 313, 19 N.Y.2d 769, 279 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crowley v. Hanf. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 N.Y.2d 745 →
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs, .solely upon the ground that the. adjournment of the proceedings in the Court of Special Sessions to a date when they could be resumed with the District Attorney present did not terminate the trial, and thus the claim of double jeopardy as a bar to its resumption is without foundation.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Bbeitel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crowley v. Hanf, 226 N.E.2d 313, 19 N.Y.2d 769, 279 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1641 (N.Y. 1967).
226 N.E.2d 313 (Crowley v. Hanf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.