Crowley v. Empey

129 P. 340, 23 Idaho 190, 1912 Ida. LEXIS 91
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 30, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 129 P. 340 (Crowley v. Empey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crowley v. Empey, 129 P. 340, 23 Idaho 190, 1912 Ida. LEXIS 91 (Idaho 1912).

Opinion

STEWART, C. J.

— This case is here on appeal from the district court of Bonneville county. The respondent is a member of the board of county commissioners of Bonneville county, and the facts are similar, and present the same character of questions, both of fact and law, as passed upon and determined by this court in the opinion this day filed in the case-of Robinson v. Huffaker. While the claims are for different amounts, and in some instances upon different contracts, the claims are of the same general character as those in the Robin[191]*191son-Huffaker ease, and it is unnecessary to discuss the facts or tbe law governing the same.

Upon the authority of Robinson v. Huffaker, ante, p. 173, 129 Pac. 334, the judgment in this case is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. Costs awarded to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bennion
730 P.2d 952 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 P. 340, 23 Idaho 190, 1912 Ida. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowley-v-empey-idaho-1912.