Crowley v. Dekle

118 So. 2d 239
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 1960
DocketNo. 59-748
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 So. 2d 239 (Crowley v. Dekle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crowley v. Dekle, 118 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By an original proceeding in prohibition in this court the petitioner sought a writ to preclude the civil court of record in Dade County from proceeding in an action for replevin of an automobile at the instance of a mortgagee, under a chattel mortgage which provided that upon a default the mortgagee could accelerate the balance due, take possession of the chattel and resell it at public or private sale, as an alternative to foreclosure.

After hearing argument and considering the briefs, the rule nisi in prohibition is discharged, and judgment is entered for the respondent. See Cary & Co. v. Hyer, 91 Fla. 322, 107 So. 684; Intertype Corporation v. Pulver, 101 Fla. 1176, 1180, 132 So. 830, 135 So. 793; Intertype Corporation v. Pulver, 5 Cir., 1933, 65 F.2d 419; Crandall, Florida Common Law Practice, § 362 (1940 Supp.)

PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur. HORTON, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fincher Motors, Inc. v. Northwestern Bank & Trust Co.
166 So. 2d 717 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 So. 2d 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowley-v-dekle-fladistctapp-1960.