Crowley v. Crowley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crowley v. Crowley

935 S.W.2d 648, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1683, 1996 WL 587596

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crowley v. Crowley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 977 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1996·No. No. WD 51913·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Luetta Crowley appeals a judgment in favor of Carl Crowley on her counterclaims for quantum merit for the rental value of property, and the reasonable value of storing soybeans. Having carefully reviewed her contentions and the record, this court finds no error in the trial court rulings.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). The decision is without precedential value. The parties have been furnished a memorandum as to the reasons for the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Luetta Crowley appeals a judgment in favor of Carl Crowley on her counterclaims for quantum merit for the rental value of property, and the reasonable value of storing soybeans. Having carefully reviewed her contentions and the record, this court finds no error in the trial court rulings.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). The decision is without precedential value. The parties have been furnished a memorandum as to the reasons for the decision.

Crowley v. Crowley, 935 S.W.2d 648, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1683, 1996 WL 587596 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

935 S.W.2d 648 (Crowley v. Crowley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.