Crowl Building Co. v. Beacon Match Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Crowl Building Co. v. Beacon Match Co.

91 Pa. Super. 580, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 240

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 25, 1927

DocketAppeal 9

StatusPublished

This text of 91 Pa. Super. 580 (Crowl Building Co. v. Beacon Match Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crowl Building Co. v. Beacon Match Co., 91 Pa. Super. 580, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 240 (Pa. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellants got a verdict in their suit to recover a balance due for work and labor done. On defendant’s motion, a new trial was granted. That action is the sole error assigned. We have examined the record in the light of the argument presented on behalf of appellants and have concluded that no abuse of discretion has been shown within the rules so thoroughly considered in Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello, 277 Pa. 530.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Appellants got a verdict in their suit to recover a balance due for work and labor done. On defendant’s motion, a new trial was granted. That action is the sole error assigned. We have examined the record in the light of the argument presented on behalf of appellants and have concluded that no abuse of discretion has been shown within the rules so thoroughly considered in Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello, 277 Pa. 530.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 Pa. Super. 580, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowl-building-co-v-beacon-match-co-pasuperct-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack