Crowell v. Messana Contractors

Supreme Court of Florida

Crowell v. Messana Contractors

188 So. 2d 777, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3432

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 27, 1966

DocketNo. 35286

StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 2d 777 (Crowell v. Messana Contractors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crowell v. Messana Contractors, 188 So. 2d 777, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3432 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 22 April, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI