Crowell v. Crowell

New York Supreme Court

Crowell v. Crowell

36 N.Y.S. 1124, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 900

DecidedDecember 2, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y.S. 1124 (Crowell v. Crowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crowell v. Crowell, 36 N.Y.S. 1124, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 900 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PRATT, J.

The stipulation obviously contemplated a speedy trial, which had, however, been evaded, and defendant showed no eagerness to bring it on. Under the circumstances, the plaintiff had a right to regard the stipulation as abandoned, and move the trial. The proper county was Queens, and, when defendant objected to Kings county, the special term judge properly ordered it to he tried there. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATT, J.

The stipulation obviously contemplated a speedy trial, which had, however, been evaded, and defendant showed no eagerness to bring it on. Under the circumstances, the plaintiff had a right to regard the stipulation as abandoned, and move the trial. The proper county was Queens, and, when defendant objected to Kings county, the special term judge properly ordered it to he tried there. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 N.Y.S. 1124, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowell-v-crowell-nysupct-1895.