Crowell v. Crowell
186 A.D. 961
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1918·Published
Opinion
We think that the defendant is entitled to the alimony pendente lite, as determined by the Special Term, and to a counsel fee (Waterman v. Waterman, 147 App. Div. 464), but that the amount thereof should be reduced [962] to $250. The order is thus modified, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crowell v. Crowell, 186 A.D. 961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
186 A.D. 961 (Crowell v. Crowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Waterman v. Waterman
147 A.D. 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)