Crowell v. Crowell
This text of 72 So. 3d 804 (Crowell v. Crowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tomasita Crowell, the former wife, appeals from an order dismissing her supplemental petition for modification that was entered at the conclusion of opening statements. We reverse. The former wife’s petition alleged sufficient grounds to support a modification as to child support, time-sharing schedule, and parental responsibility for decisions regarding the minor child’s healthcare. Therefore she should have been afforded the opportunity to try to prove her case.
However, we dismiss the former wife’s appeal of the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to the former husband. Because the trial court only determined entitlement and did not determine the amount of fees, this issue is not ripe for appellate consideration. Revier v. Revier, 45 So.3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
REVERSED and REMANDED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 So. 3d 804, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16750, 2011 WL 5109615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowell-v-crowell-fladistctapp-2011.