Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc.

165 F.2d 214
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 9, 1948·No. No. 11645·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is affirmed upon the authority of Kessler v. Eldred, 206 U.S. 285, 27 S.Ct. 611, 51 L.Ed. 1065; Marshall v. Bryant Electric Co., 1 Cir., 185 F. 499; Directoplate Corporation v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co., 7 Cir., 44 F.2d 783; Aleograph Co. v. Electrical Research Products, 5 Cir., 82 F.2d 625; General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, 4 Cir., 101 F.2d 178; United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corporation v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co., 4 Cir., 104 F. 2d 856; Fretwell v. Gillette Safety Razor Co., 4 Cir., 106 F.2d 728.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., 165 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1948).

165 F.2d 214 (Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leishman v. Radio Condenser Co.
167 F.2d 890 (Ninth Circuit, 1948)