Crowe v. Bruce
This text of 2 Ky. Op. 600 (Crowe v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion oe the Court B\r
If, as averred in the answer, the order was drawn for payment of goods bought on a credit of four months and that, through inadvertance or mistake, the credit was omitted in the order and in the unqualified complaint on sight, the action was brought prematurely and the appellee was not entitled to interest. Such a mistake, if admitted or indisputably proved, would have entitled the appellant to an abatement of the action, and was, as between drawer and drawee, an admissible defense.
The circuit court therefore erred in sustaining the demurrer to the answer and thereupon rendering judgment for principal and interest.
Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Ky. Op. 600, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowe-v-bruce-kyctapp-1868.