Crowder v. State
73 S.E. 424, 10 Ga. App. 355, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 509
Opinion
There was no evidence that the killing of the hog was malicious. The only evidence from which it was contended malice could be inferred was that the accused did not have a fence at least four and a half feet high around his crop, to prevent the destruction of which the animal was killed. In stock-law counties land lines supply the place of the statutory fence.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crowder v. State, 73 S.E. 424, 10 Ga. App. 355, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 509 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
73 S.E. 424 (Crowder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oglesby v. State
37 S.E.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)