Crowder v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Crowder v. State

116 Ala. 666

DecidedNovember 15, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 116 Ala. 666 (Crowder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crowder v. State, 116 Ala. 666 (Ala. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for forgery. The bill of exceptions not only fails to state that it contains all. the evidence, but affirmatively shows that there was other evidence introduced on behalf of the State. The court holds that in this condition of the record, it will be presumed there was other evidence which justified the rulings of the court. The judgment of' conviction is affirmed.

Opinion by

Coleman, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for forgery. The bill of exceptions not only fails to state that it contains all. the evidence, but affirmatively shows that there was other evidence introduced on behalf of the State. The court holds that in this condition of the record, it will be presumed there was other evidence which justified the rulings of the court. The judgment of' conviction is affirmed.

Opinion by

Coleman, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 Ala. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowder-v-state-ala-1897.