Crowder v. Nelson

32 Miss. 260
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 32 Miss. 260 (Crowder v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crowder v. Nelson, 32 Miss. 260 (Mich. 1856).

Opinion

Fisher, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action in the Circuit Court of Yalobusha county, [261]*261by tbe plaintiff below, to recover tbe amount of an account for services rendered by tbe plaintiff as an attorney and counsellor at law to tbe defendant.

Tbe question before tbe jury was purely one of fact — and there cannot be a doubt as to tbe sufficiency of tbe testimony to justify tbe verdict found for tbe plaintiff.

It is however said that tbe court erred in giving tbe second instruction on behalf of tbe plaintiff. Tbe defendant introduced as part of bis evidence a deposition given by tbe plaintiff in a controversy in tbe Probate Court of Carroll county, between tbe defendant and other parties. This deposition bad reference to the matters embraced in tbe plaintiff’s account, and tbe court instructed tbe jury that tbe defendant was bound by testimony which be bad himself introduced, unless it was contradicted by other testimony. This instruction was certainly correct, or at least as favorable to tbe defendant as be could ask.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCaffrey v. Puckett
784 So. 2d 197 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2001)
Timothy McCaffrey v. Kim A. Puckett
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1998
William James Sons Co. v. Hutchinson
90 S.E. 1047 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Miss. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowder-v-nelson-miss-1856.