Crowder v. Crowder

Supreme Court of Georgia

Crowder v. Crowder

240 S.E.2d 86, 240 Ga. 245, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1463

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crowder v. Crowder. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 Ga. 612 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 28, 1977·No. 32923·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

This appeal by the mother complains that the trial court abused its discretion in divesting her of custody of her nine-year-old minor child and in granting custody to the father. We affirm. There is reasonable evidence in the record to support the decision. Hawkins v. Hawkins, 240 Ga. 30 (1977).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except [246]*246 Hall, J., who dissents. Submitted November 15, 1977 Decided November 28, 1977. Albert B. Wallace, for appellant. Hutcheson & Kilpatrick, Lee Hutcheson, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

This appeal by the mother complains that the trial court abused its discretion in divesting her of custody of her nine-year-old minor child and in granting custody to the father. We affirm. There is reasonable evidence in the record to support the decision. Hawkins v. Hawkins, 240 Ga. 30 (1977).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except [246]*246 Hall, J., who dissents. Submitted November 15, 1977 Decided November 28, 1977. Albert B. Wallace, for appellant. Hutcheson & Kilpatrick, Lee Hutcheson, for appellee.

Crowder v. Crowder, 240 S.E.2d 86, 240 Ga. 245, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1463 (Ga. 1977).

Pincite

240 S.E.2d 86 (Crowder v. Crowder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related