Crow v. Walsh
This text of 3 La. Ann. 540 (Crow v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
In this cnse the plaintiff, who was the surety on a twelvemonths’ bond, endeavors to avail himself of the original judgment under which the property was sold, for which the bond was given, on the ground of Lis being subrogated to the right of the original plaintiff in the suit.
We have had occasion to examine the question as to the extent of the subrogation of sureties in such cases, which we consider as settled by our previous decisions. Trent v. Calderwood, 2 An. 942. Tardy v. Allen, ante p. 66. Old v. Chambliss, ante p. 205. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 La. Ann. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crow-v-walsh-la-1848.