Crow v. State

262 S.W. 1117, 97 Tex. Crim. 428, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 350
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crow v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Tex. Crim. 484
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 14, 1924·No. No. 8361.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Kendall County of theft of property of the value of more than fifty dollars and his punishment fixed at ten years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. There are four special charges in the record, all marked refused, but there is no notation upon any of them of the fact of any exception being taken to their refusal; nor could any of them be. held to present error if considered because of the lack of a statement of facts.

No error appearing in the record, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crow v. State, 262 S.W. 1117, 97 Tex. Crim. 428, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 350 (Tex. 1924).

262 S.W. 1117 (Crow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.