Crow v. Reed
25 Tex. 392
Opinion
—We are of opinion that there is no error in this case.
The plaintiff did not have the field-notes of his survey recorded, nor did he take such other steps in perfecting his title as were necessary to put him in a position to demand a patent for the land which he had surveyed by the deputy surveyor.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crow v. Reed, 25 Tex. 392 (Tex. 1860).
25 Tex. 392 (Crow v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stark v. Chaison
50 S.W.2d 776 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1932)
Kirby Lumber Co. v. Gibbs Bros. & Co.
3 S.W.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)